|
Manipur with its unique culture and the
excellent performance of its sports-persons
have been widely acclaimed. Unfortunately,
it is also the home to various issues and
problems: unemployment, insurgencies
movement, rampant corruption, drug abuse,
AIDS, political instability, ethnic unrest
and threat to its territorial boundary. With
this in mind, the article is confined to
look at the drug abuse and HIV/AIDS
scenarios as well as the efforts undertaken
to tackle the twin menace in this troubled
torn state.
Part I
Manipur, which has an international border
of about 350 kilometers with Myanmar, became
the victim of international drug smuggling
as the notorious traffickers found the route
through this point of international border
as a soft route. With national roads leading
directly to nations of the “Golden Triangle”
of Southeast Asia, drug trade and abuse is
widespread especially in
India’s
northeastern state of Manipur. This is
further complicated by the rise in HIV/AIDS
among young drug users. The major forms of
addiction in the beginning were mild
tranquilizers and methaqualone, followed by
inject-able morphine and pethidine. In due
course of time, heroin locally known as
Number 4, became the most widely used drug
among the young drug users, and heroin
addiction reached the explosive stage in
1984 (AIDS ALERT, 2001). Besides it, drugs
like spasoproxybone, ganja, alcohol,
phensedyle, opium, cough syrup, nitrazepam,
detroproxythene and buprenorphine have also
being abused. Generally, the young drug
users started taking drug, orally either by
smoking or inhaling and in due course of
time switched over to injection in which
they shared unhygienic injecting equipments
like needles and syringes.
Easy availability of heroin and other
illicit drugs are solely responsible for
high addiction rate in the state. In
addition, pharmaceutical drugs are also
easily available to the youngsters.
Available data, though contradictory,
indicate an estimated 40,000 drug addicts in
the state, of which 20,000 have been
reported to be Injecting Drug Users (IDUs).
However, one report by UN-AIDS put the
number of Injecting Drug Users (IDUs) to
around 40,000 (Frontline, August, 2.2002).
Study conducted jointly by the Ministry of
Social Justice & Empowerment (MSJ&E)
Government of India and United Nations Drug
Control Program (UNDCP) in 2000-01 found
that out of the 308 drug users interviewed
in Imphal, the capital city of Manipur, the
proportion of Injecting Drug Users (IDUs)
were 92 per cent; of which 10 per cent
abusers were females; all of them were
literate, of which 24 per cent were college
educated drug users; 61 per cent were
unemployed; 71 per cent were heroin users
and 23 per cent have tested HIV (MSJ&E and
UNDCP: 2002).
Along with the menace of drug addiction, the
state has also witnessed an alarming rise of
HIV/AIDS infected persons, which has been
the most serious public health problem, and
AIDS has become the number one killer of
young people. Manipur is also known as the
epicenter of AIDS in the northeastern
states. It is the third highest, next to
Maharashtra
and Tamil Nadu in regards to the total
number of HIV positive cases. However, if we
calculate the sero-surveillance rate per one
million populations, the sero-prevalence
rate of Manipur is at least 6 times higher
to
Maharashtra and 20 times to Tamil Nadu (AIDS
Alert 2001).
The most important route through which HIV
is transmitted here has been the sharing of
infected needle among the IDUs (72.76%);
whereas in other parts of India more than
74.18 per cent HIV positives have been
through sexual transmission. Quality testing
of heroines, indulged by drug traffickers
themselves also to some extend contributed
the epidemic as they traveled to and fro
between Manipur and Myanmar. Commercial sex
workers are also vulnerable to HIV and
represent a relatively significant core
group for transmission of the virus through
their clients in the state. In 1997, 60 to
70 per cent of HIV infection cases were
found among the injecting drug users and the
percentage has however come down after the
successful intervention measures and AIDS
campaigns done by State Government and
various AIDS-NGOs in the state. Manipur is
the first and only state, which has a
written State AIDS Policy in India.
Unfortunately, HIV/AIDS epidemic is no
longer confine to the Injecting Drug Users’
(IDUs), as it has spread to their sexual
partners; to their children and to others as
well. An increasing number of people
infected in the state belong to the younger
and working age groups. It is reported that,
the HIV sero-prevalence rate among the
pregnant women is too raised alarmingly.
More than 90 per cent of the HIV positive
women got infected from their husband (AIDS
Alert, 2001). The number of AIDS widows as
well children have also increased. It is
estimated that around 1000 children have
been affected with HIV/AIDS in the state by
December 1, 2001 (UNDCP E41, January 2002).
Out of total 95,734 blood samples screened
between September 1986 to April 2003, a
total of 15,166 HIV positive cases (2,297
females), and 2,106 AIDS cases (303 death)
have been reported giving a sero-positively
rate of 158.42 per 1000 blood samples
screened (Table 1). Of the 11,189 HIV
Positive cases (Sero-surveillance) young
people below the age of 30 years constituted
around 68 per cent of the total HIV
positives (Table Two). All the districts in
the state have been affected, where Imphal
East and Imphal West districts accounted to
68.19 per cent of the total HIV positives
followed by Thoubal and Churachandpur
districts, which accounted to 9.49 per cent
and 5.68 per cent respectively.
Part II
Recognizing the seriousness of the
multi-faceted implications of the incidence
of alcoholism and drug abuse in the country,
the Ministry of Social Justice and
Empowerment, Government of India launched a
scheme for prohibition and drug abuse
prevention in the year 1985-86. Since than
the ministry has been promoting a community
based approach towards the identification,
treatment and rehabilitations of addicts. In
the larger social context, a major thrust
has to be given to preventive education so
as to ensure that those at risk are helped
before they reach a point of no return.
Beginning with 7 Centers established in
Delhi in 1985-86, the total number of such
Centers functioning nationwide by 2000 had
reached 425. These included 160 CCs and 292
DCs. Likewise, by 2000; there were
altogether 27 such Centers in the state of
Manipur (14 CCs and 13 DCs) being
financially assisted by the ministry.
Besides, huge amount of money have been
spent to control the spread of HIV/AIDS
infection in the state over the year. There
are various national and international
agencies like the National AIDS Control
Program (NACO) being the major source of
finance, UNDCP, UNAIDS, OXFAM and SIDA have
been working in the field, are supporting
various non-governmental organizations
(NGOs). The Manipur AIDS Control Society
(MACS) shoulders the sole responsibility of
receiving and disbursing funds from NACO.
The expenditure also gradually increased
from Rs. 121.88 lakhs in 1996-97 to Rs.
607.48 lakhs in 2001-2002.
However, despite the effort of various
agencies the twin menaces continues to
spread alarmingly. A horde of questionable
NGOs gobbling up unaccounted sums of money
and preventive strategies like creating
awareness are executed lackadaisically. The
Manipur AIDS Control Society has been
repeatedly hauled up by the state auditors
for diverting vital AIDS funds to other
health programs. There are about 100-odd
AIDS NGOs in the state. No doubt, there are
NGOs doing excellent jobs. Nevertheless,
these NGOs also face problems relating to
accommodation, funding and manpower. There
are complaints about insufficient funding
that to erratic release of funds and the
lack of public support among others. For
better result, such NGOs need to be
strengthened with sufficient and timely
funding. Side by side their activities
should be closely monitored and the
non-performing NGOs should be identified and
funding stopped.
It is not to surprise that the outlawed
organizations of the state like
Revolutionary Peoples’ Front (RPF) and
Kanglei Yawol Kanna Lup (KYKL) also stepped
up their campaign against drug abuse. In
September 2002, two drug traffickers were
executed by the banned RPF. They have also
from time to time punished a number of drug
addicts or instruct them to get admitted in
the Rehabilitation Centers as well. The
banned Kanglei Yawol Kanna Lup (KYKL) has
even banned the sale and use of tobacco and
its related product throughout the state
from April 14, 2003. However, it is too
early to comment on how effective their
campaign is? The twin problems can be
effectively tackled only when the general
public cooperate and participate with the
agencies working in the field. However there
is lack of public interest and
participation. The community participation
can be enhanced and ensured through the
following steps:
(I) By creating awareness about the evil
through campaigns, seminars and workshops.
The target population for educational
measures for prevention should be
college/university students/ rickshaw
pullers/ truck drivers.
(II) By actively involving the government
agencies and the NGOs.
(III) By interacting and involving the
opinion leaders;
(IV) By ensuring a positive role of the
media such as newspaper, radio, TV etc.
(V) By actively involving the youth; and
(VI) By ensuring women’s’ involvement.
The various local women organizations like
Meira Paibis or women torchbearers should
intensified their fight against the evils of
alcoholism, drug addiction and also AIDS in
association with various local youth bodies.
The participation of the youth in the
campaign is a must.
Effort should be made so that illicit drugs
are not easily available, for this adequate
security along the Indo-Myanmar border,
though an expensive affair is the need of
the hour. Besides, controlling illegal drug
trafficking it will control other illegal
activities from across the border. Added to
this legal (pharmaceutical) drug like
phensedyle, cough syrup, sposmoproxybon etc.
must be sold very strictly. The situation
even compels the need for appropriate law
for giving life imprisonment to the drug
traffickers and peddlers. Policemen and
other law enforcer found working in
collusion with the drug peddlers should not
spared but promptly punished.
To sum up, the solution to the problem
requires rethinking and re-planning. The
confusion created by drug abuse and
HIV/AIDS, if not tackled in time will
furthered confused the Manipuri society. It
is urgent responsibility for all concerned
to have a coordinated effort to check the
menaces rather than leaving the whole task
to few individuals or agencies. Moreover,
the alleged secret understanding between
politicians/ law enforcer with the drug
traffickers/ peddlers should be closely
watched and punished.
References
1. Rapid Assessment Survey of Drug Abuse in
India, Ministry of Social Justice &
Empowerment and United Nations Drug Control
Program, Regional Office for South Asia,
2002, New Delhi.
2. National AIDS Control Program, Manipur
2000-2001, Manipur AIDS Control Society
(Status Report), 2003, Imphal.
3. AIDS Alert, Vol. 3, 2001, Manipur Aids
Control Society, 2001.
4. Frontline, August 2, 2002, Chennai.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table No.1 Epidemiological Analysis of
HIV/AIDS in Manipur (Sept 1986- April 2003)
|
Items |
Sero-surveillance |
Sentinel surveillance |
Total |
|
Number of blood samples screened |
62,905 |
32,829 |
95,734 |
|
Number of positive |
11,196 |
3,970 |
15,166 |
|
Number of females |
2,297 |
- |
2,297 |
|
Number of AIDS cases |
2,106 |
- |
2,106 |
|
Number of death |
303 |
- |
303 |
|
Sero-positive rate per 1000 samples
screened |
177.98 |
120.93 |
158.42 |
Courtesy: Manipur AIDS Control Society,
Imphal
Table No. 2 Age-sex proportion of HIV
positive cases ( Sero-surveillance)
|
Age group |
Males |
Females |
Total |
% of the total population |
|
0-10 years |
240 |
162 |
402 |
3.59 |
|
11-20 years |
777 |
166 |
943 |
8.43 |
|
21-30 years |
4988 |
1223 |
6211 |
55.51 |
|
31-40 years |
2397 |
592 |
2989 |
26.71 |
|
41 &above |
490 |
154 |
644 |
5.76 |
|
Total
Unknown
Total |
8892
-
8892 |
2297
-
2297 |
11,189
7
11,196 |
100.00
|
Courtesy: Manipur AIDS Control Society,
Imphal
Table
No.3: District-wise Distribution of HIV
positive Cases ( Sero-surveillance)
|
District |
No. of samples screened |
No. of HIV positive |
Sero-positivity rate (%) |
District percentage |
|
Imphal E &W |
38150 |
7389 |
19.37 |
68.19 |
|
Thoubal |
5587 |
1029 |
18.42 |
9.49 |
|
Bishnupur |
2890 |
539 |
18.65 |
4.97 |
|
Churachandpur |
2034 |
616 |
30.29 |
5.68 |
|
Ukhrul |
991 |
395 |
39.86 |
3.65 |
|
Senapati |
1729 |
423 |
24.47 |
3.90 |
|
Tamenglong |
285 |
28 |
9.82 |
0.26 |
|
Chandel |
1312 |
417 |
31.78 |
3.85 |
|
Total
Unknown
Total |
52978
9927
62,905 |
10836
360
11196 |
-
-
17.80 |
100.00 |
Courtesy:
Manipur
State
AIDS Control Society, Imphal
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* The author has done PhD, in sociology from
NEHU, Shillong and is presently associated
with the Institute for Conflict Management,
Guwahati/New Delhi...
E-mail:
m_amarjeet@rediffmail.com |