Cheitharol Kumbaba
narrates about Meitei monarchical
civilization and its evolution starting from
Pakhangba in 33 AD as the first King of
Manipur. Every society passes through the
phases of clan, tribe, ethnic and
nationhood. Pemberton (1835) wrote that the
Meiteis were descendants from a Tartar
colony, while McCulloch (1859:4) said they
are descendants from the surrounding hill
tribes, and Grierson (1905) noted they
belong to the Tibeto-Burman group of race,
while many others write; they are related to
Tai groups. While for Manipuri Muslims (Pangal/Pangan),
Brown (1873) and BC Allen (1905:64) noted
that they are descendants “from the Surma
Valley who married Manipuri women”.
Historically speaking, Lynn White, Jr.
wrote: “What has emerged is a sense of the
remarkable complexity of the interplay
between the Occident and East Asia from
Roman and Han times onward. This involved a
two way traffic, in many items, along many
routes, and of varying density in different
periods… despite difficult communication;
mankind in the Old World at least has long
lived in a more unified realm of discourse
than we have been prepared to admit”.
Manipuris, including Muslims, had trade
connection upto Yunnan since a long past
along one of the Silk routes via Manipur. CP
FitzGerald (1972:42) noted: “The direct
route to India (from Yunnan), across the
jungles of northern Burma to Manipur and the
valleys of Assam was more difficult and much
less safe. Even in modern times these
jungles have been the stronghold of
head-hunting tribes who offered only a grim
welcome to travelers”. George E. Kirk
(1964:28) noted: “By about 850 AD Muslim
ships had reached China to trade for silk,
and there was a considerable Muslim colony
at Canton; some Muslim traders pushed
further north, and probably reached Japan
and Korea”.
P. Gogoi (1968) noted that Chinese travelers
found Persian colonies or Pashas along the
Yunnan-Burma border by 860 AD. B.
Kulachandra noted that the Pangals were
found in Leimatak (Koubru hills) after
crossing the Irang River in 850 AD. They
must be Muslims from the Surma and
Brahmaputra valleys, and Brown (1873:15)
noted that the Muslim in Manipur had been
there “since a great antiquity”.
Moirangthem
Chandra Singh (Poireiton Khunthok,
1979:4-18) noted that “turban wearing
Pangals” seemingly traced to Pang, a Tai
tribe by conversion were found in Manipur
and Lilong is mentioned, and W. Ibohal
(1986: 41,52, 63) confirms this Pang tribe
during the period 810-850 AD. Dr.
Yengkhoibam Bhagya Singh (Leithak Leikharol
puya, 1956: 122-3) mentions “Pathan
Ninthourol” and “Pasha Ningthourol” (the
principalities) in Manipur during the period
of grandsons of the legendary “King Kangba
who physically lived in Manipur in the 11th
century” (Ibohal, p.9). Puyas as ‘Kanglei
Langba Pakhangba’, ‘Sakok Lamlen Ahanba’,
‘Nongchu-pharamlon’ noted that a “Pangal
Musalman guru” (saint) appeared in Manipur
from the west during the reign of Naophangba
(1140-71) and ‘Sakoklamlen Ahanba’ and
‘Manipuri Longi Kangleiron’ noted that
another Pangal saint preached in Manipur
during the reign of Irengba (1296-1310).
The Moroccan traveler Ibn Butata, via Delhi,
visited the famed saint Shah Jalal, from
Yemen or Turkistan (RM Eaton :1997:212) at
‘Kamru Hills’ in 1345 AD by sailing up the
Surma-Barak River and further proceeded to
Habanq (there is Habang at the confluence of
Makru and Barak rivers) ruled by one called
Ziena (RM Nath: 1978:50, 64; BC Allen et al:
1979) before proceeding to China by junk via
a kingdom of Pasha, which DS Richards (ed.
1970:133) says, was in northern Sumatra,
ruled by one called Malik al-Jabiz. Eaton
says this Kamru of Ibn Batuta is too vague
to be in Assam (Kamrup) hill, and suggests
Sylhet to be the place.
Manipur was known to outsiders by various
names and her territory extended as per the
conquering extent of different kings. As
known to outsiders, Abdus Sattar (In the
Sylvan Shadow: 1970: 155) noted “Legend has
it that a Manipuri prince after becoming a
Muslim, married a Mughal (? Muslim) princess
and settled down at a place called Thoubal
in Manipur Kingdom of Assam. This prince
also materially helped the advancement of
Islam within his sphere of influence”. MT
Laiba (1992:44-5) noted: “Hiuen Tsang refer
to Manipur as a part of the kingdom of
Kamrupa and the Burmese chronicles mention
Manipur as a border kingdom within the basin
of Irrawady”. So it is clear that Ibn
Batuta’s ‘Kamru hill’ is ‘Kaubru hill’ in
west Manipur that is the extension of Kamrup
Hills in the east, and hence “Kaubru” is
derived from the word “Kamru”.
As regards the place Pasha (Pasa) mentioned
in puyas as Leithat Leikharol and Pangal
Thorakpa, Pemberton (1966: 113) called it
“Basa” probably meaning Banga, capital of
Cachar, which Cheitharol Kumbaba (1989:6)
identifies as ‘Pasha’, where Samlungfa from
Pong invaded. Ibohal (1986:217) noted that
this Pasa is the Muslim province of Tarap of
the 13th century, and that Pasa/Basa is
derived from the word “Badshah”. HAR Gibbs
(1983:298, 373 ft32) similarly noted that “Pashay”,
meaning chief or king as in China too, is
derived from “Badshah”. Dr. Y. Bhagya (1956:
113ft) noted that “Pasha” means
“Turushka/Turk” as found in Vaishnavite
literatures in Assam. As Milton Israel and
NK Wagle (1983:292) noted that “the most
striking features of all the biographers,
discussions of the Muslims is the total
absence of such basic terms as Muslim,
Musalman and Islam. Instead, when referring
to persons, singly or collectively, the
texts occasionally mention Turk or Pathan”.
As MT Laiba (1992: 44-5) noted: Other than
Ptolemy, Huen Tsang, “Chinese historians (Changkien,
2nd century BC), Shan chronicles, Arabian
historian, Persian historian, Ahom and Assam
historian, European historian etc also
recorded many events that happened
subsequently in Manipur”.
Among the Muslim historian-geographers who
recorded events of this frontier region, it
included - Masudi (d.956), Ibn Khurdadbhih
(d. 850), Buzurg (930), Sulaiman Tajir (d.
851), Dimashqi (1325), Abul Fida (1331) and
Bakuwi (1400) [IFP: 20 Mar 2004]. But, the
so-called Oriental historians- desktop
writers sitting at London or Paris who got
the Arab-Persian sources (notes) translated
in English or French did their research on
Malay archipelago, they being known Muslim
lands, not knowing that “Pangals” or
“Muslims” (noted in those records) are in
Manipur, subsequently ‘quite innocently’
pilfered and dislocated history, putting
real history topsy-turvy. For example, Frank
Lebar et al (1964: 181), GE Gerini Eastern
Geography (1909:260, 895 & 906 indices)
located the “Pangan” as some ‘eastern
pygmies in Malay Peninsula”, and similarly
some of the accounts of “Pasha/Pasa” of
Manipur and Cachar-Taraf were attributed to
those of Pasa/Pasai of Java (Sumatra) etc.
Again, a confused DS Richards (ed. 1970:116)
noted: “towards the middle of the 13th
century, the prince of Tuban (on the
northern coast of the island?) was converted
to Islam and subsequently adopted it as the
official religion of the country.
In the case of Sumatra (?), Islam first
spread in the northern part of the island.
The earliest reliable news of fairly large
scale conversion dates from around 1282 AD,
when the kingdom of Pase is known to have
sent two Muslim ambassadors, Sulaiman and
Shams al-Din from China. It is not known
exactly when the first Muslim Sultan of Pase
was converted, but it must have been during
those same years as he died in 1297 AD”.
This “Tuban” seems to be “Thoubal” in the
east of Loktak Lake as Abdus Sattar noted
above.
Similarly N. Tarling (ed.1994:330) noted:
“The earliest Muslim kingdom arose at Pasai….
before the end of the 13th century”. This
seems to be the Pasa (Badshah) kingdom of
Tarap which lies to the east of the Surma
River and southwest of Sylhet of 13th
century. Ibohal noted that it existed there
for a short period (1986:216). They in all
possibility shifted en masse to Manipur, as
Shah Jalal of Sylhet around 1340s did not
find them. N. Tarling again noted:
“According to Tom Pires, Bengali traders had
long frequented Pasai, and in the latter
part of the thirteenth century had been
responsible for placing a ‘Moorish king of
Bengali caste’ (black) on the Pasai throne”.
This seems to be the ‘Kala Raja of Pangal
Mar Khul’ (Pangal village) at Loijing range
as Ningthourol Lambuba (O. Bhogeswor:
1967:80); Ibohal (p. 216) noted to be during
the reign of Irenga (1296-1310).
RM Montgomery noted that Arabs-Muslims of
early period named their ‘abode’ as ‘Mar
(a)’. So there is confusion among these
western Orientalists on locating places
between ‘Pasha’ of India’s eastern frontier
and ‘Pasha’ of Java (Sumatra). It is for
historians to conduct further
investigations. As for Manipur, Ibohal
(1986:216-7, 158, 156) he used the terms-
Panagal = Pasa= Basa for the same ethnic
group during the reign of Irengba1296-1310
AD), a contemporary of Khuman chief Nongyai
Thingkonhanba (but refused to say that they
are Muslims, though he got relevant sources
in his hands as references indicate. RK
Sanahal in puya ‘Pangal Thorakpa’ (1989: ii)
noted that he found references of Pangal (Musalman)
during the reign of Irenga with the first
clan name ‘Aribam’. Puyas- Sakok Lalmlen
Ahanba (Kh. Chandrasekhar Singh: 1992: 10,
27) refers to one “Pangal Musalman guru” in
Manipur, during Irengba’s time, which is
again confirmed by Ch. Hemchandra (Kangleiron:
1996:8) clearly as “Pangal Musalman guru”,
as in RK Kokngansna (Kanglei Langba
Pakhangba: 1950: 2).
Another Pasha: A Tibeto-Burman tribe, known
to the Poireis as ‘Hao’ left their ancestral
home near Hukong valley around the 11th
century, moved southwards along the Chindwin
River, following the medieval south
highways, and finally entered the Imphal
valley, and their cognate tribe, who also
entered this land, were Mangangs and
Thongnangs (Ibohal: 1986: 157). Muslims in
northern Thailand are called Ho (Frank M.
Lebar et al (1964:2). Adam Wolfe noted that
southern Thais ‘adopted Islam in the 13th
century” (IFP: 2 Oct 2005). Those
Tibeto-Burman Haos or neo-Burmese mostly
settled along the medieval highways from
Arakan to the Loijing ranges within the
present Lushai hills area in the latter part
of the 12th century. While inhabiting there
for a considerable length of time, they
probably got mixed with the non-Mongoloid
proto-Bangals who came from the west and
south west.
At about the early part of the 13th century
AD, a group of Bangals came and lived
together with them” (Ibohal, p. 156). These
Bangals must be Muslim traders or
disgruntled sections of Bakhtiyar Khilji’s
troops after the botched Tibet campaign in
1205AD who wanted to live peacefully. As is
noted: “With firm footing of the Muslims in
Sylhet-Cachar and Arakan by 1303 CE, started
from 1204 CE during the medieval Bengal
sultanates, either independently or
suzerainty under Mughal Empire, sprinkling
of Muslim traders and soldiers traversed
through Manipur valley and Arakan since
1210s CE”, which was unrecorded in
Cheitharol Kumbaba as its chronicling
started in 1484 AD only (IFP: 3 Dec 2003).
Muslims in the region around the period were
called Pashas with whose contact those
neo-Burmese Hao/Ho too apparently embraced
Islam and they too came to known as Pasha (Pasa).
While Ibohal (p. 156-7) opined that: “The
Bangals and proto-Bangals called the
settlement ‘Basa’ meaning ‘temporary
settlement’. The Tripura chronicle Rajmala
indicates that Basa was close to Rangamati”.
Thus two ethnic Pasa Muslim groups emerged
in certain parts of Manipur valley by the
early 13th century. “After some years of
their stay at Basa, a group of Shan invaders
headed by Samlungfa, the Pong prince came
and subdued them. After subduing Basa,
Samlungfa left northwards for some other
countries where he met the Poireis and
defeated them. After the invasion of
Samlungfa, all the inhabitants of Basa
appeared to have moved towards the north and
finally settled at Lamlangtong (Lamangdong)
at about 1225 AD and carved out a
principality there”.
They later moved to Loijing range of
Leimatol (Koubru) hill (Ibid). O. Bhogeswor
(Moirang Ningtourol Lambuba-ii: 1998:47)
noted that there was a Pangal community near
Khuga River with their chieftain Maraton
Adon, who introduced in Manipur ‘rice
seed-broadcast and transplantation’ during
the reign of Moirang King Punshi Khurel
Chauba alias Yiwang Putiklai Punshipa, who
according to G. Kabui (1991: 172) ruled by
1312-81 AD. No doubt that KC Tensuba
(1993:171) and Ibohal (1986:437) noted that
there were two Pasa (Pasha) and one Pangal
principality in Manipur during the reign of
King Irengaba (1296-1310). And clearly they
are Muslim ‘ethnic names” indicating their
heterogeneous origin, and they got
homogenized after adopting Meiteilon as
mother-tongue which was also the
lingua-franca of all Manipuri ethnic
communities since a great antiquity. |